Our main products include flexible substrate coating, shielding materials, absorbing materials, precious metal slurries, and more!

banner
Current:Home >Company news >Frontier News >The "thermal expansion mismatch" of EMI shielding copper foil tape: why does the shielding layer "crack" first at the interface after temperature cycling
先进院(深圳)科技有限公司

Hotline:0755-22277778 Tel:0755-22277778 
Mobile:13826586185(Mr.Duan)
Fax:0755-22277776
E-mail:duanlian@xianjinyuan.cn

Frontier News

The "thermal expansion mismatch" of EMI shielding copper foil tape: why does the shielding layer "crack" first at the interface after temperature cycling

Time:2026-11-11Number:8

The incoming inspection of EMI shielding copper foil tape is usually conducted at room temperature: surface resistance is qualified, peel strength is qualified, and shielding effectiveness is qualified. Material release, affixed to the entire machine, passed the EMC test at room temperature. The plan looks fine.

The problem occurs after temperature cycling testing or actual service. The whole machine experiences temperature cycles from -40 ° C to 85 ° C or wider, resulting in a decrease in shielding effectiveness and an increase in grounding impedance. Upon inspection, the appearance of the copper foil tape is intact - there are no large areas of curled edges, no obvious oxidation, and no visible cracks. But high-frequency shielding is no longer up to standard. The failure is not in the copper foil, but in the interface.

Three layer structure, three types of thermal expansion coefficients

The typical structure of EMI shielding copper foil tape is three layers: copper foil, adhesive layer, and substrate. The coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of three-layer materials varies greatly.

structural layer Typical CTE Thermal mismatch characteristics
Copper foil About 16-17 ppm/° C Minimum expansion amplitude
Pressure-sensitive adhesive layer 100–300 ppm/°C The maximum expansion amplitude is more than one order of magnitude different from copper foil
Substrate to be pasted Aluminum is about 23; Stainless steel about 17; FR-4 plane 14-17, thickness direction 50-70; ABS/PC 60–90 Change with substrate type

The CTE difference between copper foil and adhesive layer is the largest, reaching more than an order of magnitude. When the temperature changes, the expansion and contraction amplitude of the adhesive layer is much greater than that of the copper foil, and periodic shear stress is generated at the interface. The copper foil adhesive layer interface and the adhesive layer substrate interface are two locations where stress concentration occurs.

Stress Accumulation in Temperature Cycling: From Elastic Deformation to Plastic Damage

During each cycle of temperature cycling, the shear stress at the interface undergoes loading and unloading once. When the stress level is low, the adhesive layer undergoes elastic deformation, and the interface returns to its original state after the stress is released. However, pressure-sensitive adhesives are viscoelastic materials that undergo creep and stress relaxation under sustained or cyclic stress, resulting in incomplete elastic recovery.

Local debonding: starting from the stress concentration point

After hundreds of cycles, the accumulated plastic deformation at the interface begins to manifest as local debonding. Debonding starts from the location where stress is most concentrated - usually at the edges, corners, or adjacent areas of the tape to the rigid structure. A small air gap is formed between the adhesive layer and the substrate in the debonding area, with a thickness of several tens of micrometers that may not be visible to the naked eye, but is sufficient to form an impedance discontinuity in the GHz frequency band.

Copper foil wrinkling: mechanical consequences of relative displacement

Although the CTE of copper foil itself is relatively low, the interface between it and the adhesive layer is also subjected to shear. If the adhesive layer undergoes creep during temperature cycling, the relative displacement between the copper foil and the adhesive layer will cause local wrinkles on the surface of the copper foil. The copper foil at the crease is raised, forming a more obvious leakage channel than debonding.

Why is failure 'invisible': the concealment of interface defects

The debonding, wrinkling, and microcracks at the interface are almost invisible during routine visual inspection. The surface of the tape is still flat, the edges are not significantly raised, and the color has not changed. But the high-frequency shielding effectiveness is extremely sensitive to interface defects - a few tens of micrometers thick air gap is a significant impedance jump point in the frequency band above 1 GHz, where surface current is forced to bypass and leakage accumulates from these points.

This is also why the shielding effectiveness decreases after temperature cycling, which cannot be explained by "copper foil oxidation" or "decreased conductivity of the adhesive layer". The copper foil did not oxidize, and the volume resistivity of the adhesive layer did not change significantly. What changed was the physical contact state of the interface. And the interface status is not included in the inspection items for incoming materials.

Adhesive modulus and CTE: two parameters that need to be confirmed simultaneously

The magnitude of interface stress depends on the CTE and modulus of the adhesive layer. The larger the CTE, the greater the expansion/contraction amplitude of the adhesive layer during temperature changes, and the greater the interfacial shear stress; The higher the modulus, the more difficult it is for the adhesive layer to release energy through deformation under stress, and the more stress is transmitted to the interface, the higher the risk of debonding.

The ideal adhesive system is a combination of low CTE and moderate modulus - low CTE to reduce thermal mismatch, moderate modulus to absorb some stress through viscoelastic deformation. But these two parameters often constrain each other in the formula: reducing CTE usually requires increasing the filler content, and increasing the filler content will increase the modulus. When selecting, it is necessary to find a balance point between the two, rather than pursuing the optimal value of a single parameter separately.

Selection judgment based on "interface integrity after temperature cycling"

Firstly, suppliers are required to provide shielding effectiveness or grounding impedance data after temperature cycling, rather than just providing initial values at room temperature

The data at room temperature cannot reflect the evolution of the interface under thermal stress. For vehicle mounted, outdoor, or scenarios that require wide temperature range cycling, the shielding effectiveness retention rate of the magnetic separator should be confirmed after hundreds of cycles from -40 ° C to 85 ° C (or actual operating temperature range). If the supplier can only provide data at room temperature, the reliability of temperature cycling cannot be determined.

Secondly, in the selection of material systems, the CTE and modulus of the adhesive layer are considered as screening criteria alongside conductivity

Low CTE reduces thermal mismatch driving force, while moderate modulus provides stress buffering capability. When selecting, the CTE data and modulus (or glass transition temperature) data of the adhesive layer should be confirmed with the supplier, not just the type labels of "acrylic adhesive" or "rubber adhesive".

Thirdly, reduce stress concentration at the interface in structural design

The edges, corners, and areas adjacent to the rigid structure of the tape are stress concentration locations. If space permits, leaving a small "stress relief zone" at the edge of the tape or using rounded corners instead of right angles can reduce the peak shear stress at the edge. For large-area shielding layers, consider using whole piece die-cutting instead of splicing to reduce the number of interfaces at the seams.

Fourth, retest the shielding effectiveness of the actual sample after temperature cycling during the sample stage, rather than releasing it after testing at room temperature

The interface defects after temperature cycling are not visible during visual inspection and can only be exposed through electrical performance testing. For scenarios requiring high shielding effectiveness, retesting of shielding effectiveness after temperature cycling should be considered as an independent verification item, rather than an ancillary item of overall reliability testing.

Advanced Institute (Shenzhen) Technology Co., LtdThe EMI shielding copper foil tape product line covers bare copper, tin plated, and nickel plated substrates, providing thermal expansion coefficient and modulus data for different adhesive layer systems, as well as shielding effectiveness retention data after temperature cycling.

The product supports matching the adhesive layer system based on the target temperature range and cycle times, helping engineers find an acceptable balance between interface thermal stress and conductivity. For more technical information, please visithttp://www.avanzado.cn/.

Contact Us

Company: Xianjin Yuan (Shenzhen) Technology Co., Ltd.
Address: 8/F, Zhongxing Building, Shajing Xinsha Road, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Tel: 0755-22277778  |  13826586185
Email: duanlian@xianjinyuan.cn
Website: http://www.avanzado.cn/
Related news
Hotline
0755-22277778
13826586185(Mr.Duan)
Wechat QRcode Wechat QRcode